21Feb Selecting a Wireless setup for your DSLR rig.
Selecting a wireless system is kind of like picking out an apartment, you could live anywhere, but would you want to? After trying 4 or so different wireless setups the one I settled on is the Sennheiser G2 series, because it’s rugged, preforms well, runs on AA batteries, and has a nice little cold shoe mount adapter.
Does this mean it’s right for you? Not necessarily. When picking a wireless mic setup there are a few things to consider.
- How much do you have to spend?
- How far away from the talent do you need to be?
- What kind of mounting will you be using?
- Are you filming in a urban area or out in the country?
The number one factor that will determine what wireless system you buy is how much you have to spend. Wireless systems like the Lectrosonics 400 series work amazingly well, but at a price of almost $2500 each, I’ll never own one. So Lets look at a few more affordable options.
The least expansive wireless system I’ve ever used is the Audio Technica PRO88W. For a price of $125 you get 2 vhf channels, a cold shoe adapter, and a lavalier microphone. The transmitter and receiver both run on a single 9 volt battery and the body is made out of plastic. You don’t get a lot of range, I’ve been able to get 40 feet line of site before I started to notice problems. With only 2 VHF channels (UHF is better) to select from this probably isn’t a great choice for conventions, but if you live in a small town, or only plan to use this for intimate one on one interviews or blogs It could work well.
If you are prepared to spend about twice that much you can pick yourself up the Azden 105 Series Wireless Microphone for about $250 to $300. The Azden units are a mixed bag, you get 90+ UHF channels, good range (mine worked 2 rooms away and line of site up to 200 feet), and clean enough audio. The down side is that the unit is made out of plastic, the controls are poorly designed and the audio can get a little bit over modulated when the settings aren’t right. If you need to make adjustments to the settings, you actually have to get out the included plastic tools and fiddle around with very tiny screws. Not only is this a pain, but it also takes a lot of time. One other note is that the included lavalier mic is rather large.
I tried to give this unit a chance but after about 3 weeks of messing around with the horrible controls I gave up on it. The Azden 105 preforms well for the price if you’re willing to put up with the adjustment pains and the plastic.
Once you get fed up with the head ache of using the Azden 105, the Sony UWP-V1 wireless system is a breath of fresh air. At a price of around $400 you get 188 UHF frequencies to chose from, a solid metal body, and controls that are simple and easy to use. The Sony UWP-V1 runs on AA batteries and comes with both a cold shoe adapter and a lavalier microphone. It also includes both a XLR and a mini-plug output cable so you can easily adapt this to any setup. The other nice thing is that you can adjust the power output of the transmitter to increase battery life if you don’t need the talent to be far away.
So if I like the Sony UWP-V1 so much why did I end up with the Sennheiser G2? Well 2 reasons, the first one being the size of the receiver. The Sennheiser G2 receiver is about 2/3rd the size of the Sony receiver making it a little nicer for on camera mounting. The second is that I wanted an XLR transmitter as well as a transmitter body pack so I could do on the scene style interviews. At the time I was in the market, the Sony model was out of stock and I ended up buying the Sennheiser ew100 G2 system instead.
At the time the Sennheiser and Sony models were almost the same price but it looks as though the Sony units have come down in price while the Sennheiser has stayed about the same. Honestly I think both the Sony and Sennheiser wireless units are about even as far as performance. Some people feel that the Sennheiser controls are a little bit confusing and others find the size of the Sony units a down side.
Having owned both, I think the size of the Sennheiser system still wins me over, but if I had to do it again and the price was $100 less I would probably have gone with the Sony UWP-V1. Either way both of these units are very rugged and well made, I don’t think you’ll go wrong with either if your willing to spend the money.
On a side note the Sennheiser ew100 G2 can often be found on ebay for much less then the retail price. So if your willing to wait a little bit then .
February 21st, 2011 at 9:34 pm
Deejay
Your provided me this info via email and Thank You! I figured I would ask this on here as to maybe help someone else. Are there any differences in sound quality wireless vs. wired? I am awaiting the arrival of the Audio-Technica AT803 will be running it through the JuicedLink DT454 on my Canon 5D MK II. I may consider wireless in the future but most of my videos will not require that much distance..yet!
George from Virginia
February 22nd, 2011 at 8:39 am
There can be a differences in audio quality, but it isn’t really a strict yes or no answer. The typical frequency response of a UHF transmitter is around 40hz to 18khz. The frequency response of your Audio-Technica AT803 is 30hz to 20khz, so there would be a slight loss in audio quality, but chances are you wouldn’t notice it (there is actually a lot more math involved if you feel like reading about nyquist theorem and Voice frequency ranges). Many mid range and lower range lavalier microphones fall within or close to the frequency response range of a typical UHF transmitter. It would take a very well trained ear to notice any significant difference. Now if the device you are recording on is of high enough quality, and you are using good cabling, and the microphone is top notch (lets say a KMR81), then the difference between wired and wireless will be somewhat noticeable, but probably not enough difference to justify the cost in many cases.
February 22nd, 2011 at 10:01 am
Hey Deejay
Thank you that is great to know, because as I become more comfortable in my videography I can see where a wireless mic would definitely benefit me. Thank you for making this learning curve from still photography to video seem easier!
George
February 28th, 2011 at 11:05 am
[…] The 1/4 20 female threads on the bottom of the handle also gives you a handy place to mount a wireless receiver or Rode VideoMic, so you can avoid Canon’s shrunken hot […]
March 7th, 2011 at 8:20 pm
[…] zoom lens (canon 16-35mm f2.8), one prime lens (sigma 30mm f1.4), the t2i, Zoom h4n, and my trusty Sennheiser G2 wireless mic. I did pack a few extra memory cards and a few extra batteries, but I’m going to be on my […]
March 17th, 2011 at 7:47 pm
[…] a little crowded, but if you set it up just right you can fit the Zoom h1, a Rode VideoMic, and a wireless receiver all on one bracket. #gallery-1 { margin: auto; } #gallery-1 .gallery-item { float: left; […]
March 19th, 2011 at 11:34 pm
DeeJay seriously my man i wouldn’t know what to do with out you man!!!!! you are literally like the Google of what do man!!! you dont only provide people with the information they may need, you always throw in a little more with options!!! thanks again!!!!
April 15th, 2011 at 10:33 am
[…] will add to much weight to a rig that has to be carried all day so removing that gives you room for wireless audio and a mixer. I’ve found that the easiest way to cover event audio is to keep a lapel mic on […]
July 15th, 2011 at 5:37 pm
[…] of room underneath for 2 lenses (Canon 50mm f1.2 and 35mm f1.4), the Sony CLM v55 monitor, the Sennheiser G2 wireless kit, the Okii usb follow focus, an intervalometer, and the Canon t2i with battery grip. I also have […]
February 10th, 2012 at 4:42 pm
[…] come to the point where I need a few extra UHF wireless microphones systems around. The Sennhieser G2 wireless system I use right now works great and most of the time the two sets I use are plenty, but lately […]
April 11th, 2012 at 1:35 pm
[…] is feeding the input of the Juicedlink DS214 on the right which is then feeding the camera below. A Sennheiser G2 wireless unit is plugged into channel one and my Rode Videomic is plugged into channel […]
August 23rd, 2012 at 8:05 am
I can’t figure out the whole FCC frequency restriction issue that I keep hearing about regarding wireless transmitter-receievers. Can you recommend a resource that would explain what to look out for when shopping used? I’d hate to buy a setup that was obsolete because the frequency wasn’t available, etc.? Thanks, awesome site, you are doing a great public service here!
August 23rd, 2012 at 11:00 am
Basically stay clear of anything labeled UHF with a transmitting freq between 700mhz and 800mhz.
Here’s a link for more info.
August 5th, 2013 at 5:05 pm
Can both the Sennheiser and Sony models work with two body packs? For instance if I want to do a shoot with two or three people being interviewed and want to have each person with a separate lapel mic, can the receiver get all the signals and record? Thanks for the help